Three challenges of the phone interview: "Can you hear me now?"

by mgill 31. July 2009 05:28
 Below are three of the most common challenges of a phone interview and how to try and overcome them. 

 

1. Body Language: When you conduct a phone interview, don't take it from your cell phone in a car or at the local Starbucks.  Get yourself in an office: no kids, no dogs, no distractions.  I know this sounds obvious but believe it or not, I've had my share of calls where the background noise makes the conversation near impossible. You wouldn't bring a dog or a child to a face-to-face interview, would you?  Be sure to put yourself in a professional environment, it will come through on the phone.   

 

2.  The Endless Answer: One of the most difficult questions on a phone interview is "so, walk me through your resume" (one of my top five least favorite questions of all time).  For most of us this has the potential to go on for hours. Before you start, get some clarification. What are they looking for?  Reasons for moving from one role to another?  Responsibilities while in the role?  Structure and direct reports?  Business impact?  Knowing the details for the position and your  audience (HR, CMO, Board Member) beforehand will help you prepare your refining question, but don't fall into the trap of the endless answer.

 

3.  Unable to "Connect": Pause, ask for confirmation of your answer, and ask if you are on the right track.  Be sure to elicit feedback that requires more than yes or no answers.  A good one, if timed and appropriate, is "What about my background do you find most applicable for the role of X?" It is critical on the phone interview to create a conversation and not just a Q&A session.

 

I hope these tips help you "reach out and touch someone" during your next phone interview.

MATT GILL | Senior Vice President | Executive Search
Pile and Company, Inc. | 800 Boylston Street, 14th Floor | Boston, MA 02199
P: 617.587.3958 | M: 617.276.2514 | F: 617.421.1899 | W: www.pileandcompany.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewwgill
Pile Blog: http://www.pileandcompany.com/staffing/blog/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/Matt_Gill_4

 

 

Bookmark and Share

Tags:

Agency Size Does Matter

by jneer 29. July 2009 02:18
We recently blogged about whether or not geography is important to clients and our key take-a-way was that both client and agencies should be sure to state if and what the geographic parameters are upfront so that no one is selected to participate in the entire review process only to find out in the end that they don’t meet the desired location.

The same thing can be said for size, although this is a barrier that is a little more challenging to overcome.  A client wants to feel important so they don’t want to be the smallest client on an agency’s roster and potentially not get the attention they deserve.  On the flip side, no client wants to be the largest client and carry a burden of thinking what might happen at the agency if the two parties parted ways.

Probably the single most important factor in determining the right size for an agency is the scope of work.  Many agencies say they can be nimble or staff up accordingly to work on a client’s business.  But most clients need the manpower in place as soon as the relationship starts and no one wants to have an overworked and understaffed agency team that could lose motivation, slip on quality control or miss deadlines.  

As part of our process, we help a client determine what the right size is based on their scope of work or total marketing spend.  Every client is different and our advise to the agency is to not bite off more that you can chew; be true to the size of your agency and determine the right size client business that you can support unconditionally.

Bookmark and Share

Tags:

The BBJ Reports on Study: 'Strategic thinkers' hard to find in Boston

by mgill 27. July 2009 10:05
I always find surveys interesting and many have left me scratching my head.  This particular study reported that “Some 80 percent of Boston-area employers say it’s difficult to find “strategic thinkers” in the Boston-area talent pool. According to a 2009 survey by #Camden Consulting Group and the Human Capital Institute…”  Full article:http://www.bizjournals.com/boston/stories/2009/07/20/daily66.html So I read the report and I found this in the first bullet in the summary: “Boston Employers experience significantly fewer barriers to acquiring and retaining needed talent than the national average.”  There is a very positive theme throughout the report when you compare national average to the Hub.  Just thought it was worth mentioning. 

But, let’s go back to the title, “'Strategic Thinkers' hard to find in Boston”.  Come on, for starters there was no agreed-upon definition for 'Strategic'.  I've worked with hundreds of organizations, each with their own definition of Strategy. I know there is no lack of Strategic thinkers in Boston.  On average, I meet 10 executives a week- all have different levels of strategy but I can assure you there is no lack.  More specifically, there is a lack of ability and desire to hire strategic thinkers. Reality is, companies are all looking for people who can make immediate positive impact on the organization.  This impact is generated by tactics, not strategy.  Until companies decide they are going to hire for strategy (and that time may not be far off) the hiring practices will speak louder than any survey.

MATT GILL | Senior Vice President | Executive Search
Pile and Company, Inc. | 800 Boylston Street, 14th Floor | Boston, MA 02199
P: 617.587.3958 | M: 617.276.2514 | F: 617.421.1899 | W: www.pileandcompany.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewwgill
Pile Blog: http://www.pileandcompany.com/staffing/blog/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/Matt_Gill_4
Bookmark and Share

Tags:

Getting the most out of your outplacement firm

by mgill 17. July 2009 04:03
There are many benefits to partnering with your outplacement firm.  Unfortunately a number of execs I speak with don't take full advantage of this valuable resource.   Often times the personality of the exec is the reason for this.  More specifically, they believe they can do it on their own.  All they want from their outplacement firm is an office and a phone, they know all there is to know about resume  writing, interviewing and networking - it 's basic blocking and tackling after all isn't it? 
I am going to make an assumption that we can agree, finding your next position is a full time job.  Isn't it logical that success at any job improves with years of experience and training in the discipline?  How much experience and training do you have in job search? There are many people in transition, who have seamlessly moved from one opportunity to another and have never actually conducted a job search.  Even if you have once or twice it's a relatively easy argument that partnering with an expert in  job search would be beneficial.   
In your most recent position as an exec I doubt you were the expert in everything you managed.  To be a successful you have to rely on your leadership and management skills to get the best results out of your direct reports, consultants and vendor partners.  An outplacement firm is exactly the same.  Manage your outplacement firm the same way you managed your most successful consultant or vendor partnership.  Work with them and benefit from their expertise with regards to the job search strategy and tactics. They will rely on you as the subject matter expert when it comes to you, your experience and your career goals. 
MATT GILL | Senior Vice President | Executive Search Pile and Company, Inc. | 800 Boylston Street, 14th Floor | Boston, MA 02199P: 617.587.3958 | M: 617.276.2514 | F: 617.421.1899 | W: www.pileandcompany.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewwgill
Pile Blog: http://www.pileandcompany.com/staffing/blog/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/Matt_Gill_4
Bookmark and Share

Tags:

Agency Solution: Unbundle or Bundle?

by jneer 15. July 2009 09:49
Trends in the marketing communications world can be unpredictable.  One year, it’s all about integration and having one AOR.  The next, specialist agencies (i.e. digital, media, direct marketing, etc.) are necessary to address the importance of specific needs.  

So, it came as no surprise when I was recently asked “what is the best model of a client/agency partnership?”  Is it full-service or specialists?  Bundled or unbundled?  And while my answer may not provide the clarity we would all wish for, the truth is there is no proverbial “one size fits all” solution.  

For example:
  • Client X has a cross-functional communications team with one centralized budget.  They look to their agency to tell them how and where to  spend the dollars.  Client X may work best with a full-service agency.
  • Client Y has a significant digital budget, a senior-level digital leader and an internal team that drives the strategy in the digital space.  Chances are high that Client Y will likely want a digital agency.
  • Client Z has a large internal marcom team that drives the brand in every way.  They are only looking for an agency to come up with great creative.  Client Z could work with many agencies on a project basis.

To add further proof to the fact there is no perfect solution, we have recently worked with two separate clients with diametrically opposite needs.  One that had 8 different agency partners and wanted to bundle everything within one agency, and the other client had everything at one agency and wanted to unbundle.  

I don’t think there will ever be a perfect solution.  The good news is Pile can help clients of every size and complexity determine the right agency partner.  
Bookmark and Share

Tags:

Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.6.1.0
Theme by Mads Kristensen